Menu Close

Tag: Affordable Care Act

Association Coverage Affected By ACA

The American Veterinary Medical Association announced earlier this year it would be ending its medical coverage for its 17,500 association members and their dependents on Dec. 31, 2013, bringing to light the issue of association coverage and how association plans could be affected by the Affordable Care Act.

“The guaranteed issue coverage mandate – in other words, you have to take somebody regardless of previous conditions – makes those kinds of plans too risky for an insurer,” says Jay Jensen of Insight Benefits Group. His firm has been working with the AVMA to find alternative health care coverage for its members. “It changes the dynamics of the plan for the insurance company.”

The plan’s underwriter, New York Life Insurance, notified AVMA it would no longer underwrite major medical coverage for professional associates after 2013 because of impending federal health care regulations.

Read more…

California Exchange Shows Lower Premiums…or Does It?

The health insurance exchange Covered California has been making headlines recently. Thirteen insurance carriers have submitted plans to be offered on the state-based health insurance exchange come 2014 and the premium rates released for these plans are lower than federal actuaries and budget forecasters had expected. Covered California has predicted that rates for individuals in 2014 will range from two percent above to 29% below average small-employer premiums this year.

These rates are surprising given the recent flood of studies performed by independent entities such as the Academy of Actuaries, the Congressional Budget Office and the Milliman Index, which all predict that, once the health reform law is implemented, insurance premiums in the exchanges, especially those for the young and healthy, are likely to spike in most states.

But are they?  The California data release compares individual plan coverage rates to small-employer plan rates—an apples-to-oranges comparison. The pure, unsubsidized premium costs of individual coverage versus employer coverage normally shows that individual market rates are lower, given that group purchasers often opt for richer plan designs. A more appropriate comparison might have been the cost of projected individual rates in California for this year versus next year. Forbes’ Avik Roy did such an analysis and found that the difference in mandated benefits and rating changes will result in individual-market price increases of between 64% and 146% when you compare 2013 individual premium rates with proposed 2014 exchange rates. It’s true that the availability of subsidies will reduce the amount many exchange consumers will pay out of pocket for their coverage, but that doesn’t mean the actual premiums will be reduced–far from it.

Clearly, the Obama Administration will take what it can get when it comes to positive press surrounding the health reform law. To further draw attention to the news of California’s lowered premiums, President Obama travelled to San Jose today to give a speech touting the law’s benefits. But even during that address, Obama acknowledged that some Americans are likely to see their premiums rise, although he encouraged them to blame their employers rather than PPACA.

“Employers may be shifting costs through higher premiums or higher deductibles or higher copays,” he said. “There may still be folks out there who are feeling higher costs.”

Source: NAHU, Washington Update

Ohio Insurance Regulators Warning Of “Rate Shock” Under ACA

Over the weekend, a handful of sources, mainly regional or beltway publications, report on an analysis out of Ohio which predicted premiums in the state would rise under the Affordable Care Act, giving evidence to the right’s warnings of “rate shock.” The Cleveland Plain Dealer (6/9, Koff) reported that Ohio’s insurance regulators “are warning that some health policy premiums may skyrocket next year,” while critics “counter that the Ohio Department of Insurance used confusing and misleading information to arrive at that conclusion.”

Ohio is using a study by the Society of Actuaries and “estimates the cost to cover healthcare insurance will rise an average of 88 percent” for individual insurance policies. The Plain Dealer said HHS has found the society’s study “flawed” and “continued its criticism this week and, with other critics, said the state should have used actual 2013 figures rather than those from a study.”

The Hill (6/10, Baker) “Healthwatch” blog noted that “the cheapest policy available in Ohio after the Affordable Care Act takes full effect next year would cost roughly $280 per month.” Modern Healthcare (6/7, Block, Subscription Publication) also reported.

Roy Reacts To Ohio Rate Projections. Avik Roy, in a piece for Forbes (6/10), argues that the latest evidence out of Ohio proves that “Obamacare will dramatically increase the cost of insurance for people who buy it on their own.” Roy concludes, “the bottom line is this: President Obama and then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi promised that premiums would go down for those who already have insurance.” And while “for those lower-income folks who benefit from the subsidies provided by other taxpayers, the costs they see may go down.” However, “middle-class Ohioans will pay more in taxes to pay for those subsidies, and more in premiums.”

Source:  NAHU Newswire

The Looming Premium Rate Shock

Well the confusion has begun! That is to assume that we all were not already there.

The respected publisher Forbes released an article on May 24, 2013 that shocked everyone. Rates to be offered on the California Insurance Exchange effective 01.01.2014 will actually be lower relative to our existing existing market rates.

Forbes contributor Rick Ungar writes that rates will actually be lower, not higher under Obama Care and the first round of rate releases in California proves this.  Surprising even Ungar, an Obama Care supporter!

These assertions are indirectly backed up by the Congressional Committee of Energy and Commerce  attacking a separate House Report on ACA that reports everyone is about to experience rate shock. Only to be followed up by Forbes article stating that there will be rate shock, rebutting its own Ungar article just a few days earlier.

Read the above links to learn more but know that they are both right.

Those sick and currently paying high rates will no longer be discriminated unfavorably by the insurance industry AND those well and health paying low rates will no longer be discriminated favorably by the industry.

It can be argued both ways by honest people.