Menu Close

Tag: Employer Group

Covered Oregon To Abandon State Website, Use Federal System

News that the board of Oregon’s failed state-based marketplace, set up under the Affordable Care Act, voted to move to the Federal site generated heavy national coverage over the weekend. Friday night, the CBS Evening News (4/25, 6:40 p.m. EST) reported, “Today, the state of Oregon said that after months of trying, it cannot get its state health insurance web site to work. It hasn’t signed a single customer, and it is pulling the plug. It is the first state to do that.” CBS’ Nancy Cordes said, “the board of Oregon’s exchange admitted defeat, voting unanimously to stop trying to fix the web site. It is a $248 million failure, but state health officials calculated it would have cost $78 million more to get the web site working, compared to just $4 to $6 million to simply join 14 other states on the federal exchange.” CBS News noted that “several other states, including Hawaii, Massachusetts, and Maryland, are all still trying to get their web sites to work properly as well.”

        Jason Millman wrote in the Washington Post Share to FacebookShare to Twitter (4/26, Millman) “Wonkblog” that Cover Oregon officials are scheduled to meetMonday and Tuesday with CMS officials on the transition. The Post calls the decision “a disappointment” for Oregon and its Gov. John Kitzhaber (D), “who tried to position the state at the forefront” of the Affordable Care Act’s debut.

        The Wall Street Journal Share to FacebookShare to Twitter (4/26, Dooren, Subscription Publication) reported that Oracle Corp., which built Oregon’s troubled site, said it would assist with the transition to the Federal website. A remaining issue is how to handle people who may need to switch between state-run Medicaid enrollment and the Federal exchange.

        The Oregonian Share to FacebookShare to Twitter (4/26, Manning) reported that “Cover Oregon closed one of the sorrier chapters in the history of Oregon state government.” The state’s new chief information officer, Alex Pettit, told state officials that moving ahead with the state’s site presented both too much risk and cost. Oregon will still need to hire a systems integrator for the transition. The Oregonian notes that “Cover Oregon has spent about $181 million in its 33-month existence,” while “most of the federal grant money that has funded the operation has been spent.”

        In its short report, USA Today Share to FacebookShare to Twitter (4/28, Kennedy) notes the move came “after months of website glitches and the move to paper enrollment forms.” In response, the paper notes, CMS spokesman Aaron Albright said, “We are working with Oregon to ensure that all Oregonians have access to quality, affordable health coverage in 2015.”

        The Los Angeles Times Share to FacebookShare to Twitter (4/28, Ganga) reported that Pettit said after the vote that there “wasn’t anything wrong with the vision. … This was not a failure of policy. The failure was in the build.”

Read full article here.

Contact Steven Cosby with questions or to request more information and to schedule a healthcare plan evaluation, savings analysis or group plan solution for your company.
[contact-form subject=’Website inquiry’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Company Name’ type=’text’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

A Brief History of Obamacare Delays

Did anyone really doubt that the final Obamacare enrollment deadline would slip, too? It’s not like the Obama administration is setting a new precedent with its latest move — giving customers more time to enroll after next Monday’s deadline if they’re already in line. In reality, the administration is just continuing a long pattern of delays. They’re all designed to show flexibility and help the law work better, but they also fuel a public perception that Obamacare deadlines never really mean anything.
The administration already went through the same exercise in December, cutting people some slack if they were stuck in cybertraffic by the deadline for Jan. 1 coverage. Then and now, administration officials argued that it’s only fair to give people extra time if they were held up by the volume of last-minute sign-ups. But the list of delays covers so much more. The administration has bent deadlines for the employer mandate (twice), put off the launch of the Spanish-language enrollment site and even delayed the enrollment season for 2015 — pushing it off until after the November midterm elections.

Read full article here.

Contact Steven Cosby with questions or to request more information and to schedule a healthcare plan evaluation, savings analysis or group plan solution for your company.
[contact-form subject=’Website inquiry’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Company Name’ type=’text’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

Higher Fines Compel Uninsured Americans to Sign Up

Uninsured Americans’ likelihood of signing up for insurance differs depending on the amount of the fine they would have to pay for not carrying insurance. At a hypothetical $95 fine level, uninsured Americans are as likely to say they would not get insurance (46%) as to say they would (47%). At a $500 fine level, the percentage saying they would get insurance jumps to 60%, but this percentage levels off at a $1,000 fine level at 62%.

Read full article here.

Contact Steven Cosby with questions or to request more information and to schedule a healthcare plan evaluation, savings analysis or group plan solution for your company.

[contact-form subject=’Website inquiry’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Company Name’ type=’text’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

The Economist Who Exposed ObamaCare

In September, two weeks before the Affordable Care Act was due to launch, President Obama declared that “there’s no serious evidence that the law . . . is holding back economic growth.” As for repealing ObamaCare, he added, “That’s not an agenda for economic growth. You’re not going to meet an economist who says that that’s a number-one priority in terms of boosting growth and jobs in this country—at least not a serious economist.”

Read full article here.

Contact Steven Cosby with questions or to request more information and to schedule a healthcare plan evaluation, savings analysis or group plan solution for your company.

[contact-form subject=’Website inquiry’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Company Name’ type=’text’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

The First Attacks Based on the CBO Report on Obamacare and Workers

The Congressional Budget Office report on the impact of the Affordable Care Act was released on Tuesday, and already we have the first attack ads.
The Fact Checker devoted one column to explaining what the CBO’s report actually meant. But we have long learned that all the fact checks in the world won’t stop politicians if they think an attack line moves voters. So how do these early attacks fare?

Read full article here.

Contact Steven Cosby with questions or to request more information and to schedule a healthcare plan evaluation, savings analysis or group plan solution for your company.

[contact-form subject=’Website inquiry’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Company Name’ type=’text’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]